The Right Of Habeas Corpus - 1531 Words

The war on terror seems to be a never ending story, especially with the current events such as the beheading of two Americans by the terrorist group ISIS. These are barbaric people,whom have no regards for human life, and they need to be stopped.Which brings me to the issue of habeas corpus, and the rights or civil liberties of detainees who have been deemed enemy combatants. To understand the right of habeas corpus in the context of the war on terror, you must first understand the historical evolution of habeas corpus, including its English and American traditions,examine times in U.S. history when habeas corpus was suspended and their applicability to the present, closely analyze the relevance of habeas corpus to the contemporary U.S.†¦show more content†¦The provision of habeas corpus goes back for centuries. In America, the British colonists believed very strongly in habeas corpus,for it was in England where the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 was Civil Liberties and War on Terror 3 formalized , and where which the term has been used as far back as the 14th century.(Habeas Corpus,2013). The Constitution of the United States made provisions concerning the writ, because prior to the American Revolution, individuals were unfairly denied this civil liberty.(Habeas Corpus,2013) The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia(Habeas Corpus,2013) states, â€Å" the Constitution of the United States provides that The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it (Article 1, Section 9). (Habeas Corpus,2013 para 2). Though protested by Chief Justice Roger Taney but upheld by Congress at the beginning of the Civil War in 1861,a suspension of habeas corpus in U.S. history was issued by President Lincoln.(Habeas Corpus,2013) Of course this wasn’t the last time that prisoners’ rights to habeas corpus caused a stir. In the 1950s and 1960s, prisoners

Industrialization Causes Corruption in Businesses - 900 Words

No man can be a good citizen unless he has a wage more than sufficient to cover the bare cost of living, and hours of labor short enough so that after his days work is done he will have time and energy to bear his share in the management of the community, to help in carrying the general load. We keep countless men from being good citizens by the conditions of life with which we surround them. We need comprehensive workmens compensation acts, both State and national laws to regulate child labor and work for women, said 26th president of United States Theodore Roosevelt as he was explaining how industrialization had ruined peoples lives ( Colby 515). Industrialization is defined as the large-scale introduction of manufacturing, advanced technical enterprises, and other productive economic activity into a society. Industrialization is a huge aspect of society and especially in America. After the American Civil War in 1861, a lot southern plantation owners were living in poverty because they lost their land. Emancipated slaves were also living in poverty because most them didn’t have a job, but as industrialization grew in America, more people were attracted to the cities up North. A lot of southerners and emancipated slaves traveled up North because of job opportunities. But this proved to be a horrible mistake. These people were working in gruesome conditions and were exploited. So the question is, what does industrialization do to a society? Industrialization causesShow MoreRelated The Progressive Era Essay798 Words   |  4 Pages Industrialization led to the rise of big businesses at the expense of the worker. Factory laborers faced long hours, low wages, and unsanitary conditions. The large corporations protected themselves by allying with political parties. The parties, in turn, were controlled by party leaders, rather than by the members. Many people felt that all power rested with the politicians and businessmen. Reformers known as Progressives at tempted to undo the problems caused by industrialization. The ProgressiveRead MoreEssay on Reconstruction and Industrialization1259 Words   |  6 PagesReconstruction and Industrialization After the Civil War, the nation witnessed two major social-economic movements: Reconstruction and Industrialization, which changed the country completely and made it one of the greatest industrialized countries in the world. However, it changed not only the country, but also, the society, its way of life and traditions. The effort to rebuild the southern states and restore the Union was known as Reconstruction, a period that lasted from 1865 to 1877.Read MoreIndustrialization During The Civil War1281 Words   |  6 Pages The Industrialization era in the United States brought immense change to the rebuilding country after the civil war. During the Industrialization era in the United States reforms were made to help create a better working condition to go along with the increase of production and growing number of people in the workforce. Key individuals helped advance the process of a more industrialized America, however corruption in business and politics also monopolies in certain parts of industries came withRead MoreThe Progressive Era in America1086 Words   |  4 Pagesstarted getting involved into national entities. Some were further developed into trusts, cartels or monopolies. They killed off the local or small businesses with a small amount of money that they would not care about and took over the majority market with high price and income. Instead of a decline of forceful leadership in Washington, there were corruption, cronyism and incompetence of the political mechanism, which had a sign ificant preference towards the monopolies and the rich. With the massiveRead MoreThe Development Of The East Asian Miracle2515 Words   |  11 Pagespreceding two sections on the existing literature and propose an alternative theory. In brief sum, the existing developmental state literature, including that specific to South Korea, argues that the developmental state causes economic growth through export-led industrialization. I reverse the order of two links in that theoretical chain. Specifically, I argue that the developmental state does not give rise to export-led growth. In fact, it is the inception of the export-led growth strategy thatRead MoreGilded Age DBQ901 Words   |  4 Pages Whether or not the politics of the Gilded Age failed in dealing with social and economic issues has long been debated by historians. Peeling away streaks of gold plastered on the deficiencies of the time, the cause of such problems can be unveiled. In finding a blame for the corruption within the growing economy and its demands on a wavering society, all fingers point to the politics of the Gilded Age. Heel to heel with the end of the Civil War, the Gilded Age was a baptism of sorts; it was freedom’sRead MoreThe Industrialization After the Civil War1438 Words   |  6 PagesAssignment 1.2: Industrialization after the Civil War Final Paper Melissa Rogers November 10, 2014 History 105: Contemporary U.S. History Dr. Reeves Introduction The Industrial revolution improved the American lifestyle all the while causing many problems along the way. The Industrial Revolution contributed to the growth of cities and their economy. This created more jobs thus causing for workers to move their families to the northern regions of the country for work on farmsRead MoreIndustrialization During The Industrial Revolution1577 Words   |  7 PagesIndustrialization – ever changing the face and heartbeat of our society and the world in which we live – since the Industrial Revolution began in Britain (from 1760 until sometime between 1820 and 1840). The improvement of business acquisitions and evolution of trade were essential to the Industrial Revolution. Most of the British population lived in the countryside, in small villages, and interacted closely within their family unit and work. Industrialization, however, drastically altered theRead MoreAn Analysis of the Populist and Progressive Era1663 Words   |  7 Pa gesminds and hearts of the Populist’s, and became the center and the driving force of the Progressive era. During the gilded age railroads were being built, Industrialization was rising, the population of United States was increasing dramatically; and corporate businesses were becoming extremely powerful. The gilded age was known for its corruption and business domination, it wasn’t until the Populist movement when people started to fight back and also not until the Progressive movement when people startedRead MoreAyn Rand and How Her Works Criticize Collectivism Essay1376 Words   |  6 Pagesplus enough for export to help pay for industrialization. These changes were intended to improve conditions for everyone by collectivizing agriculture and establishing communal eating facilities where peasants could eat all they wanted free of charge (chronicle.uchicago.edu). The Great Leap Forward was a program by the Communist Party of China that aimed to change the country fr om an agrarian economy into a communist society through fast industrialization and collectivization. This led to prohibition

Modern Philanthropy and Civil Society †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Modern Philanthropy and Civil Society. Answer: Introduction: Philanthropy is the decision to promote human welfare which can be expresses especially by the generosity in terms of monetary donations for good causes. Philanthropy is a crucial aspect of a democratic society and is a tad different from charity and it focuses on the removal of social problems. It also supports projects as well as tries from which all segments of the society as well as the people benefit. This might include libraries, museums as well as scientific research. It also backs efforts which might be too controversial or unpopular in order to get total support from the government and common people alike. The concept of philanthropy is to improve the well-being of humankind by the prevention as well as solving of social problems. Charity is not the same as philanthropy because it focuses on the eliminating the social problems whereas philanthropy focuses on the elimination of suffering caused by the social problems. Going at the root of any problem and helping in its eradication altogether is basically the concept of philanthropy management. Charity might help a person or group of persons temporarily but philanthropy helps in the removal of the problem altogether. The origin of philanthropy is several thousand years old. Ancient people also practiced philanthropy for a variety of reasons. It has a private sector engagement with the civil society. The notion of civil society is quite ancient. Since ancient times human societies required cooperative behaviour for the purpose of survival and it can be easily stated that the primitive patterns of social harmonisation and institutional methods shaped and will continue to shape the world at present. There has been a great amount of interest in the civil society management. There have been several debates related to the new interests related to the civil society. The universal acknowledgement of the rise of the civil society has been significant. Every individual can be thought of as a member of civil society (Adam 2009). Every individual can be considered to be linked to the civil society and institutions in the public space. The degree of the participation in private and public life is very closely related to the characteristic actions of persons belonging to the civil society. Civil Society: The term civil society is supposed to mean several things in the modern time period. The words of non-profit organisations as well as the philanthropy, a setup of international NGOs, the social relations involving mutual respect and several others come under it. All these ideas are responsible for reflecting the myriad interests as also the identities present in the contemporary society. It also includes the chore of working in order to better the worsened conditions in the world. In a particular society where there are increasing instances of intolerance, the problems related to the freedom of doing something and that of belief, an inability to pursue the common goods, the chance of the bettering of the civil society is responsible for creating a ray of hope in the otherwise disheartening scenario. The models of a positive civil society suggest a ray of hope in an otherwise morose situation. Civil society and its difficult framework of freedom, rights, common commitments and also the processes for the peaceful solving of problems is the reason for it being promising in the future situation. There is an enabling framework for the purpose of democracy and there is also an inherent tension a flimsy amount of balance between the public and private interests. Maintenance of this balance is imperative to the finding of solutions for the major challenges in the modern democracies which require public resolution and also challenges such that environmental degradation, the important educational needs, ethnic needs, ethnic as well as religious strife and the difficulties and lowered quality of public decision making. These are considered as issues of the commons, the resolution of it determines the situation that people will encounter in future. Issues related to Philanthropy: There are certain issues which are related to the well-being and ultimate survival of the community and these are related to the individual decision making in the significant situations that might arise in any segment. The well-being and the ultimate survival of the community is extremely critical. Hence the role of philanthropy is extremely crucial for the proper management and benefit of the society. The creation and the sustainment of the institution of the frameworks and the proper norms of the society need to be met successfully. Philanthropy is considered to be the central value of the civil society. The concept is strongly concerned with the tradition of the emphasizing of the personal action for the common good. Philanthropy is an indispensible vehicle for the realising of this intention towards the common good of the civil society. The concept of the free communication is extremely important for the development of the society and the betterment of the people (Stuckler, Basu and McKee 2011). Tolerance is also an extremely important aspect of the civil society. The essential as well as the defining value of the civil society is considered to be the determinant for the proper acceptance of philanthropy. Observations on Philanthropy: The most significant observation is the study is the rise of the concept of giving which involves small and individualistic giving in specifically emerging market economies. The study states that the emerging market economies also are significant in the concept of giving and being philanthropic by nature. The development of philanthropy is often neglected and often it has been found that it has not been properly recorded in certain situations. Nevertheless its contribution towards the overall welfare of the people is significant. The concept of philanthropy is neglected in situations where the concept of giving is given the name of welfare service. The concept of philanthropy was progressive and this meaning of was not understood clearly in certain scenarios. There are reasons that specific issues receive more amount of philanthropic support. This is because there are certain visible natures of poverty as well as inequality which is responsible for the philanthropists to act immediat ely and provide immediate relief. In certain situations there is the need for philanthropy to be relevant. In order to be at par with the times, philanthropy has to break from the moulds of normalcy in order to be relevant. There is a significant endowment for the greater amount of flexibility in the foundational frameworks. The relationship with the corporations and the formation of the profit as well as non- profit organisations is crucial as they change the nature of the civil society. In this connection there needs to be a relation of the civil society with the businesses and the development of the trust is also crucial in order to work together (Banks and Hulme 2012). The alignment of the profit along with the social values is not a very new phenomenon in the different parts of the World. Since the non-profit organisations are interested mainly in the improvement of the human welfare as well as the realisation of the human rights the most important focus of the organisations of the civil society is on those corp orations which show a real and noteworthy commitment to a social purpose (Reckhow and Snyder 2014). In this particular situation in Case the civil society has to maintain and in fact increase its relevance, there needs to be a certain amount of courage and strength in order to shape the global values. It also needs to be explored how a profit motive can be better aligned with the values as well as rights based approaches. Global value chains needs to be shaped, the influence of the flows of the financial capital needs to be understood, there also needs to be a better aligned system of the actual motives of the organisations along with the actual performances. By the active engagement and the help of the selected corporations to evolve the influence of the very fabric, a new nature of global capitalism has come about. According to studies it has been seen that, several enterprises have the desire and the drive for mission driven impact and hence an ultimate benefit for the organisation. The role of the private sector is linked with the global development. There are several corporations that think of ways and methods in order to avoid the harm which is caused by the unfettered desire for the accumulation of profit. There are cases when the leaders of the organisations as well as their employees are desirable of contributing to social good by the promotion of positive human development. There have been instances in which the increased amount of the private sector development in the tracking leads to the increased development to grow. It can undoubtedly be stated that the future will include certain approaches to the human welfare which leverage the public, private as well as the non-profit sectors. There has been an undeniable increase in the prevalence of the private sector. All the aid flows have been so modest that it is extremely unreasonable to expect them to have economy wide impact in connection to the volume of the private resources which flow across borders or which are available within a country for the development of the country. Certain segments or communities are focussed on certain aspects which might include the issue of homelessness, conservation as also the disabilities of different communities. It corresponds to the corporate social responsibility that depends on the sustainable value chains as well as the business models (Galaskiewicz, 2016). Facing the philanthropic world: The most important problem of facing the philanthropic world over the next decade is actually an illumination of the self understanding as a social as well as a cultural factor. It is an important question of whether the philanthropic institutions are part of the private government sector being therefore an element in the vital civil society or just a part of the governmental institutional sector. It is usually considered that the civil society is a place for great freedom, impulsiveness as well as creativity (Schuyt, Smit and Bekkers 2013). This might also be due to the reason that the empowerment of the ordinary people has no predescribed ends and can make the civil society messy, unpredictable and even uncontrollable. It can also become subversive to a dangerous extent. This is a characteristic which few foundations are quite brave enough to support. There have been distinct approaches to philanthropy and it is necessary to do so in order to avoid the debates which are only a function of the lack of awareness of different prevalent methods. One type of philanthropy is the concept of charitable giving. This involves the accruement of beneficiaries. A giver of charitable nature is concerned majorly with the value of the programmatic execution which is relative to the size of the grant size and cares very little related to the non-profit organisation. Another type is that of philanthropic investment, which seeks to invest resources into non profit enterprises for increasing their ability to deliver execution of specific programs. This investor is mainly focussed on the longer increase in the improvement of the execution in connection to the grant size. Strategic philanthropy is another aspect for the buying of the non profit goods and services connected to the theory of change which are defined by the strategic philanthropist. The execution by the grantees advances the solution which according to them is the most likely to solve problems which they seek to address. Social entrepreneurism seeks to execute those programs directly which are linked to a theory of change. Other organisations approach engage with the help of these organisations. They are mainly concerned with the net social impact of their programs. Corporate philanthropy is when the setting up of standalone charitable foundations are an effective vehicle. Companies are becoming more and more aware of their responsibilities to the communities in which they operate. Major amount of engagement is being seen in corporate social responsibility programmes (Nickel and Eikenberry 2009). There is another concept of giving circles which is powerful and simple at the same time. It happens when individuals come together and pool their funds, decide together where to give the money and also to learn about the community and also understand properly about the concept of philanthropy. The opportunity in order to shape a group for meeting the specific requirements of a community and the particular interests and also the capabilities of the donors remain the most appealing characteristics of a giving circle. The grant making philosophy is adopted by the philanthropic organisations which have grant rounds where proposals are submitted for funding for the companies. On the other hand, the concept of social finance involves the lending of money with the main purpose of achieving positive social change. The money is lent if only it is felt that the money will achieve a positive social impact. On such occasions, the money is paid back with rates of interest which are affordable. Community foundations are non profit organisations which mobilize and invest technical and financial resources in a particular geographical area. The goals are to improve the quality of life of a population and to assist in the community development. Venture philanthropy on the other hand addresses the growing need for the support as well as flexible funding. It came from the application of the techniques which are most commonly associated with the venture capital to the task of philanthropy (Daly 2012). There is also the prevalence of partnership led philanthropy for the maximisation of the impact by the utilisation of expertise in the cooperation with other philanthropic organisations and also in the achievement of the aims. Several other ideas need support as well. There is no doubt regarding the role of philanthropy in the modern societies. There are certain inherent responsibilities incumbent upon the sate with regard to its citizens. It is understood that when the resources are limited, the gaps can be filled by the individuals who have the means to do so. Thus all the major philanthropic institutions have done a lot to stop the spread of diseases, improvement of education, creation of infrastructures as well as the sustainability of the cultural life of communities all around the world (Koch 2012). In case of several people, the drive to support the charitable endeavours is the recognition of the fact that every individual has the potential and can be realised only under the right circumstances. This is because the large foundations have several problems in case of many organisations. It can safely be said that philanthropy is not just the donation of money but is dedicated to providing relief to several number of people in need of several requirements (Sievers 2010). The successful philanthropy is quite the same as successful business. It also requires to search for a field in which a person can make the most impact and ensure that the service has the most amount of effect. Just like businesses the charitable foundations need to be aware of excessive wastage of funds as well as inefficiencies in the operations. This is because only profits are not at stake. Conclusion: Philanthropy can fill the gaps which are created by the market failures. The private sector is an effective mechanism for the allocation of the resources in the society and also for the production of better products, goods and services. Philanthropy is also seen as a good way to produce social benefit. There are certain amount of risks which can only be taken by philanthropists and nobody else (Sulek 2010). A benefit of sorts in case of philanthropy is that it is not risk contained in any way. It also helps in the scaling of good ideas. Innovative solutions can be identified to challenging problems, for their testing out, the development of their evidence of efficacy and the sharing of the learning procedures which help in the demonstration of the activities. Philanthropy allows us to connect and share values which are responsible for drawing people to this concept. There is an amount of human satisfaction in giving and that cannot be forgotten. Philanthropy arises out of the human impulse to be of service and help in order to be of service to others. The role of philanthropy in modern society is well captured by the concept of the actual venture of capital. There are always newer ways to contribute towards the society. Thus philanthropy needs to be pursued for the proper welfare of society and people in utmost need of it. References: Adam, T., 2009.Buying respectability: Philanthropy and urban society in transnational perspective, 1840s to 1930s. Indiana University Press. Banks, N. and Hulme, D., 2012. The role of NGOs and civil society in development and poverty reduction. Daly, S., 2012. Philanthropy as an essentially contested concept.VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,23(3), pp.535-557. Galaskiewicz, J., 2016.Social organization of an urban grants economy: A study of business philanthropy and nonprofit organizations. Elsevier. Koch, F., 2012.The new corporate philanthropy: How society and business can profit. Springer Science Business Media. Nickel, P.M. and Eikenberry, A.M., 2009. A critique of the discourse of marketized philanthropy.American Behavioral Scientist,52(7), pp.974-989. Reckhow, S. and Snyder, J.W., 2014. The expanding role of philanthropy in education politics.Educational Researcher,43(4), pp.186-195. Schuyt, T., Smit, J.H. and Bekkers, R., 2013. Constructing a philanthropy-scale: Social responsibility and philanthropy. Sievers, B.R., 2010.Civil society, philanthropy, and the fate of the commons. UPNE. Stuckler, D., Basu, S. and McKee, M., 2011. Global health philanthropy and institutional relationships: how should conflicts of interest be addressed?.PLoS Medicine,8(4), p.e1001020. Sulek, M., 2010. On the modern meaning of philanthropy.Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly,39(2), pp.193-212.

Its Not a Small World After All free essay sample

Growing up, I did not do anything really out of the ordinary; the only safari I had been on was the one in San Diego and aside from reading and implementing my Dad’s copy of How to Win Friends and Influence People I was fairly average. But even as an average kid, the camping, road trips and sightseeing never quite quenched my thirst for something more: culture. I can only blame my parents for my insatiable curiosity; after all, they were the ones who put me into a school that started teaching French in kindergarten. I had the American-mainland version of island fever, knowing that an entire world was just around the corner. The only way to cure my craving was to actually do something about it, so when my Youth Pastor handed me a packet with the information for a mission trip to Sydney, Australia, I mentally packed my bags. We will write a custom essay sample on Its Not a Small World After All or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The price tag for the trip was reasonable, but still thousands more than any unemployed sixteen year old could afford. Immidiately after signing up, I talked my way into a job, sent out letters, and started begging my family and friends for empty bottles and cans to be recycled into the nickels and dimes I needed for the plane ticket.Flash forward about five months, and there I was, living my dream. I was sitting across from three people on a couch, all from different countries, in a hostel in Australia talking about politics. Who knew that four young people could have such an interesting conversation about the Liberal and Labor parties of Australia? But it was not just the conversation that surprised me it was my new friends’ personal problems, ideas of what was considered â€Å"fun†, opinions on American TV shows, and their senses of humor that were all so similar to mine. I was experiencing so many cultures at one time just because of the location I was in, and it was a dream come true. But it was the differences that I was most fascinated with as I was completely immersing myself in all things â€Å"Aussie.† It was exciting to actually take advantage of the public transportation, and excitingly awkward when we learned the hard way that asking for something â€Å"to go† and then sitting down to eat it was a major offense. Simply speaking, I got the culture shock of my life.I imagined a map of the world while I was there- the U.S. on one side and Australia on another, then I placed my house and myself at the opposite ends, and allowed that image to linger for a while. The petty problems I place so much importance on were the same problems the people I was talking to at the hostel had, and whether the outcomes of those problems were good or bad, their lives would continue and the world would go on. As it turns out, this world is pretty small once it is put into perspective, yet big enough that not one person can claim to be the center of it.I believe a well traveled person is one of the most knowledgeable people in the world, and one who can understand and appreciate many cultures has the most to offer a society that often struggles to be cohesive. As an average kid that has gotten a mere taste of my dream, I refuse to accept my surroundings as â€Å"enough.† I find myself seeking the environments in which I can most grow as a world thinker and where I can contribute my thoughts as someone looking to impact and explore this world for I know that it is there that I will thrive.

The Search for Identity Dorothy Allisons Bastard Out of Carolina

The Search for Identity Dorothy Allisons Bastard Out of Carolina THE SEARCH FOR IDENTITYIn her novel, Bastard Out of Carolina, Dorothy Allison tells a story of Bone and the Boatwrights, a family besieged by poverty and violence. Throughout the novel, the reader uncovers the lives of all the different characters, and discovering the identity of these characters plays a large role in understanding the novel as a whole. Within the Boatwright family are women who are constantly faced with the struggle of finding themselves in a patriarchal society. Anney, Alma and Raylene each have their own characteristics and ideals and as the novel progresses, Bone successively displays identity characteristics of each of these women. To Bone, these women exemplify the different levels of independence that a woman can achieve in such a society. In the end, while Alma and Anney are unable to break free from a male-driven society, Raylene remains independent, and Bone finds her own identity through her experiences.Bastard Out of Carolina (film)Bone's aunt, Alma, does not have her own identity- she relies on men and children to form her identity for her. She is married to Wade, a man who consistently has extramarital affairs. Alma "had finally caught Wade doing just what he'd been doing for years," (83) and moved out with her children, only to break under the stress of not having a man in the household. Almahad sworn she wouldn't have Wade back in her life till he crawledthe length of Main Street singing what a dog he was, but when thebaby got sick and the boys started running around at night, she gaveit up and moved back in with him (90-91).Though Wade blatantly disrespects her in every way, Alma lacks the strength and ability to leave him for good, because doing so would strip her of the only identity...

Board of directors Essay Example

Board of directors Essay Example Board of directors Essay Board of directors Essay The Objective of this case is to allow a discussion Of issues such as the importance of board and senior management succession planning and what it entails, the difference between a Chairmans and Coos roles, attributes of a good Chairman, and whether former senior executives should become board chairmen. HASH A Model of smooth succession HASH has a long history of smooth board and senior management succession underpinned by clear succession plans. Regular review of these plans by independent non-executive directors also serves to strengthen its robustness. This is the abridged version of a case prepared by Apple Gogh, Icosahedra Than, Mabel Koch, Lee Carrier, Oh Kaki IL and Song Heighten under the supervision of Professor Make Yen Teen and Dry Vincent Chin Hushes. The case was developed from published sources solely for class discussion and is not intended to serve as illustrations of effective or ineffective management or management. The interpretations and perspectives in this case are not necessarily those of the organizations named in the case, or any of their directors or employees. This abridged version was edited by Rachel Gogh Ye Ling under the supervision of Professor Make Yen Teen. Copyright 0 2013 Make Yen Teen and CPA Australia. 165 The succession process for the Board Chairman position involves extensive benchmarking against external candidates to ensure its internal candidates are up to standard and not simply chosen by virtue of their insider status. This seeks to ensure that the best candidate is chosen one who has the capacity for strategic thinking, authority to run the board, and personal standing to represent HASH externally. Institutional shareholders are consulted with respect to the succession plan, in addition to an independent search process for potential candidates. Hashs past successions for the Board Chairman position have been low key, thou major disruptions to the business or public outcry. Successions have also been traditionally consensus-driven, with the succession receiving unanimous support from the board of directors. Overhauling Hashs Model of Succession In May 2006, Michael Change replaced Stephen Green as CEO of HASH while Green was promoted to Chairman. Despite executing another smooth CEO-to-Chairman hand-overly , HASH was criticized for its tradition of promoting its CEO to Chairman, as this was perceived to impair the Chairman from independently and objectively monitoring the company. The handover as thrown into focus in part due to a climate of growing focus on corporate governance. The roles at HASH had traditionally been such that the Chairman functioned more as a CEO, while the CEO served as the deputy. Following the handover, Green concurred with governance critics that the operational management and oversight roles should be separate and distinct. He spent the next few years of his term as Chairman taking significant steps to re-define these two roles, transferring the responsibility for strategy development from Chairman to CEO in 2009 and taking on more of a monitoring and ambassadorial role as Chairman. Besides paving the way to a more palatable corporate structure within the bank, these actions emphasized Hashs renewed commitment to corporate governance. 166 The End of an Era of Smooth Succession In late May 2010, news that Green was to step down as Chairman of HASH within a year leaked out in various media reports. According to these reports, Hashs board was prepared for the transition and had spent the past three years putting together a succession plan. This involved ceasing the tradition of promoting the CEO to Chairman, and naming possibly the banks first nonconsecutive Chairman successor John Thornton a HASH non-executive director who was also a former Goldman Cash partner. However, these rumors were refuted by HASH. Four months later, on 7 September 2010, an official HASH announcement confirmed that Green had agreed to become the U. K. Minister Of State for Trade and Investments. Following the announcement, the bank revealed that it had always intended to approve a successor to Mr.. Green before the end of the year, and that timetable remains on schedule5. However, Green had initially announced in May that he would stay on as Chairman until at least he spring of 20116 but he had suddenly decided to leave before the year- end, leaving the bank with just three months to appoint a replacement. His premature departure forced Hashs board to come to a swift decision regarding the succession. As Green was highly regarded as a modern influence on the 145-year-old bank and had led it admirably through the 2003 U. S. Supreme division crisis as well as the 2008 global financial turmoil, it came as no surprise that Hashs share price plunged when nevus of Greens leaving first leaked in May 2010 investors viewed his departure as the loss of major asset for the bank. With no official word from HASH on the candidates to succeed Green, there was widespread speculation in the media. It was reported that, within HASH, many wished for the bank to maintain its tradition of promoting the CEO to Chairman. CEO Change was a hardworking bankers banker8 who had held posts within HASH all around the world in his 37 years with the bank, a decisive and quick-thinking CEO who had earned the 167 respect of many of his staff. However, certain factors hampered Egomanias appointment. First, it seemed that his aggressive management style did not it well with investors, who did not see his adversarial ways as suited to leading the boards and performing the ambassadorial role of a Chairman. Second, and perhaps more significantly, corporate governance guidelines since 2003 had recommended that British companies should not elevate Coos to Chairmen 10. HASH appeared inclined to abandon its tradition Of promoting the CEO to Chairman and appoint a non-executive Chairman as a more independent check on the CEO-led business. This would leave Change out of the race. Given this turn of events, the boards final decision on chairmanship was very much unpredictable to observers. This was apparent from the extensive list of potential candidates generated through public speculation. Other frontrunners for the role included John Thornton, a non-executive director who was more well-received by investors 1 because of his independence from bank management, but an unpopular choice internally due to his harsh management style developed from his stint at Goldman Cash. Another candidate was Douglas Flint, Hashs Finance Director, who was viewed as a compromise candidate 1 2 to placate both investors and management, although he had perceivably less showmanship and experience t HASH than Green and Congenial 3 and faced the same question on independence. Media reports also mooted the idea of a temporary Chairman with Simon Robertson (a senior independent director at HASH) taking the role. However, this was widely viewed as unlikely given Robertsons role as Chair of the Nomination Committee, designated to appoint Greens successor, and his existing duties at Rolls-Royce. With seemingly no clear successor at the time of Greens announced departure, and a myriad of potential candidates that appeared to leave the public and internal stakeholders divided, the succession looked poised to be he most chaotic that HASH had seen for a long time. 68 Power Struggle in the Boardroom To add to Hashs troubles, news leaked on 21 September 2010 in The Financial Times that Change had threatened to resign after being informed at a meeting that the board did not intend to give him the position of Chairman 5. Hashs executives commented that Change could be unhappy at the possibility of being passed over in favor of Thornton. HASH eventually followed up wit h a strongly-worded denial of the incidents 6. However, the damage had been done the information leakage had given the public an insight into the boardroom power struggle. The picture of a fractured board and rifts over Hashs succession were thrust into public spotlight. Even though the official stance of HASH and its top management suggests that Egomanias threat to resign might have been exaggerated and sensationalistic 7, what the public saw at that point in time was an extremely disorganized and poorly conveyed succession plan within HASH, which is liberating of a large global bank. Naturally, many questions arose. If this leadership transition had indeed been planned for, why did stakeholders and n particular, Change, not seem aligned to the plan prior to the announcement, leading to internal confusion and the subsequent uproar? It was clear from an external viewpoint that HASH had not conveyed the plan and managed expectations well, both internally and externally. The pressure was intensified for HASH to achieve a resolution as swiftly as possible, in order to assuage investors discontent, prevent divisiveness within the organization on candidate selection, and restore its public mage. The Dilemma In selecting a new Chairman, the Nomination Committees dilemma was Obvious. Change was a long-serving HASH banker with a wealth Of intimate knowledge on Hashs operations. With Green already leaving, the loss of Change would be a double-whammy. Yet, condoning Egomanias appointment and promoting him would undermine shareholders wishes, and impede Hashs effort to keep up with changes in the governance landscape. 169 It seemed like no resolution would be able to completely reconcile the interests of shareholders and management. The need and urgency for the board to arrive at a resolution in keeping with the best interests of the company and to quell public speculation on the internal rift was pressing, while external perceptions of an ill-conceived and ill-conveyed succession plan continued to plague HOICKS. The Resolution On 24 September 2010, just three days after the reported spat between Change and the board, HASH unveiled a new leadership teamed. After consideration of numerous factors, the board made a unanimous decision to appoint Douglas Flint to succeed Green as Chairman. Stuart Guiltier was appointed Group Chief Executive, while Sir Simon Robertson remained the senior independent non-executive director and assumed the concurrent role of Deputy Chairman. Change would continue to serve in an advisory opacity until 31 March 201 1, after which he would formally retire. John Thornton stayed on as Hashs non-executive director. The appointment of Robertson as Deputy Chairman was aimed at countering investors discontented about the newly-installed, predominantly executive leadership team. Investors Reaction Investors reaction to the new leadership team was generally positive. On the day the leadership changes were announced, HASH shares increased by 0. 4 percent to 666. 4 pence. General investor sentiment was that despite the infighting, the right men have ended up in the right jobs21. However, many institutional investors manned upset at the poorly executed succession, and their disapproval manifested in numerous calls for Hashs non-executive directors to be replaced, to take responsibility for the bloody mess22. 170 Hash: Whos the Boss? Discussion Questions 1. What is the purpose Of a succession plan and what are the components Of a comprehensive succession plan? 2. How is succession planning for the board and senior management different for companies with controlling shareholders? 3. Identify the problems that arose as a result of Hashs Chairman succession. What was lacking in Hashs succession plan? 4. What is the impact of poor succession planning on HASH and its stakeholders? 5. What are the roles of the Chairman and the CEO? How are they different? What are the attributes of a good Chairman? 6. What are the pros and cons of having the CEO becoming the Chairman?

Strategic marketing Case analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Strategic marketing Case analysis - Essay Example In fact, the brand value of Haagen-Dazs has become the top-ranked ice cream all over the world. Another strong point of Haagen-Dazs is its decision to penetrate the global countries particularly in Japan, the United States, Canada, London, France, Germany, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Taiwan, and South Korea. Reaching out for the global market contributes to a bigger global share for Haagen-Dazs. A good marketing strategy was used by the company in terms of their decision to penetrate the five-star hotels and high-class restaurants. The said marketing promotion by giving the customers who purchase at least a 500ml tub of Haagen-Dazs ice cream products would receive a free voucher which entitles them for a discounted meal for two among the participating restaurants. This strategy was effective in encourage the spread of word-of-mouth which creates a brand awareness Lastly, the company uses a massive marketing distribution such as the retail stores, supermarket chains, delicatessen, cinemas, convenience stores, bakeries up to video stores, etc. Considering the good quality product, store outlets were carefully chosen by the marketers. Unlike in other multi-national companies that manufacture ice-cream products, Haagen-Dazs is focused only in producing luxury ice-cream. This makes Haagen-Dazs lose some market shares who prefers product that ranges between economy to standard quality ice-cream. When other competitors started to follow the foot-step of Haagen-Dazs in terms of producing an extra luxury ice cream at a much lower price, Haagen-Dazs was no where to go but to shred of some of their market shares with the competitors. The only way for Haagen-Dazs to be able to win back its market share is by producing a much better quality ice cream at the same price or produce a lower quality ice cream at a much lower price. I believe that the strongest quality that Haagen-Dazs was able to create is